Skip to main content

Estimating Continuous Time Transition Matrices From Discretely Observed Data

April 2006
Yasunari Inamura*1

Click on wp06e07.pdf to download the full text.

Abstract

A common problem in credit risk management is the estimation of probabilities of rare default events in high investment grades, when sufficient default data are not available. In addressing this issue, increasing attention has been paid to the use of continuous time Markov chains for modeling transition matrices. This approach incorporates the possibility of successive downgrades leading to defaulting in such a way that a very slight probability of default can be captured. In banking applications, however, the approach faces a problem with data limitations, since it requires continuously observed rating data to estimate intensities for transition matrices. In reality, the data frequency of internal rating systems for individual banks is either annual or bi-annual. To make the approach more applicable, the estimation methodology based on discretely observed rating data needs to be examined from a practical perspective. Against this background, the paper discusses and compares the small sample performances of the five estimation methods designed for discrete time observations -- diagonal adjustment, weighted adjustment, quasi-optimization approach, expectation maximization algorithm and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation -- by measuring differences in default probabilities of investment grades and several matrix norms. Monte Carlo experiments reveal that the MCMC gives the most accurate finite-sample performance, both in terms of the estimated default probabilities and the matrix norms. Moreover, a case study to examine the impact on the loss distribution of a hypothetical investment grade portfolio shows that differences in these estimation methods have the potential to yield significantly different estimates of economic capital.

keywords:
Default probability, LDPs, Markov chains, In.nitesimal generator matrix

JEL-codes: C13, G21

Any views expressed represent those of the author only and not necessarily those of the Bank of Japan. I would like to thank Mogens Bladt, Til Schuermann and Toshiaki Watanabe for their helpful comments and advice. I am also grateful for comments received from sta. members of the Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, and the Financial Systems and Bank Examination Department at the Bank of Japan. Any remaining errors are solely upon the author.

  • *1 Financial Systems and Bank Examination Department, Bank of Japan
    E-mail: yasunari.inamura@boj.or.jp

Notice

Papers in the Bank of Japan Working Paper Series are circulated in order to stimulate discussions and comments. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank.

If you have any comments or questions on the working paper series, please contact either author.

All rights reserved. Reprint or reproduction of this paper without permission is prohibited.